|
The review process at Sacramento State takes place on three parallel tracks: Accreditation, Assessment, and Non-academic Program Assessment
These processes serve several important internal and external functions, including: making our records and documentation explicit and publicly available; setting appropriate criteria and standards for quality of learning and performance outcomes; systematically gathering, analyzing, and interpreting evidence to determine how well performance matches standards; and the utilization of supportive data to document, explain and improve performance.
|
The overall university planning process that relates
to the strategic plan, key performance indicators,
objectives, progress reports, and budget and action plans.
|
|
Structured around the eight themes of the Strategic
Plan and the major components of the planning
process and is intended to provide information on
the planning process and quality improvement
activities.
|
|
At the academic program level, each department
and university-wide program prepares a self-study
that includes an assessment plan and evaluation
of data relevant to the unit's stated goals and
desired outcomes. These documents are
reviewed by an external consultant and an internal
program review team as part of the program
review process.
|
|
The California State University, Sacramento
self-study and reports associated with the
WASC Re-accreditation process:
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
OIR generates the assessment reports
annually for the seven Equity Programs. Four
measurements are adopted to evaluate the
effectiveness of the programs: Enrollment
trend, Second year retention rate, First-term
GPA and Good Standing rate. The reports
demonstrate the impacts of each program on
student academic performances based on
statistical analyses. All of the reports are
password protected.
|
 |
OIR generates the assessment reports annually for the
Learning Communities and Freshmen Seminars
(excluding EOP participants). Four measurements
were adopted to evaluate the effectiveness of the
programs: Enrollment trend, Second year retention
rate, First-term GPA and Good Standing rate. The
reports demonstrate the impacts of each program on
student academic performances based on statistical
analyses and the survey results.
|
|
 |
The assessment of Student Affairs' programs and units reflects the continuous effort to gather, analyze, and interpret data which help describe the “effectiveness” of Students Affairs’ programs and departments. |
|
&
A schedule of the assessment activities of the OIR
at Sacramento State and an overview of survey
instruments used and methods of administering
them in the assessment of students, faculty staff,
programs, and the institution as a whole.
|
|
|